i-choose-healthy

alfonsofiedler/i-choose-healthy

For Christmas I received an intriguing present from a buddy - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was totally written by AI, with a few simple prompts about me provided by my good friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and really funny in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty style of writing, but it's likewise a bit recurring, and really verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's prompts in collating information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an .

There's also a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI -book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had offered around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, considering that pivoting from putting together AI -generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to produce them, based upon an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who created it, can order any further copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone producing one in anybody's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, created by AI, and designed "entirely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach worries that the product is meant as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get sold further.

He wants to expand his range, generating various categories such as sci-fi, and maybe using an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - selling AI-generated items to human customers.

It's also a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce similar material based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we actually imply human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is photos. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI -generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for creative functions need to be prohibited, but I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without consent should be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely effective however let's construct it morally and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually chosen to block AI designers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have chosen to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to use creators' content on the internet to help develop their designs, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also highly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of joy," says the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining one of its finest carrying out markets on the vague promise of growth."

A federal government representative stated: "No move will be made till we are definitely positive we have a useful plan that provides each of our objectives: increased control for ideal holders to assist them certify their material, access to top quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI strategy, a nationwide data library including public information from a wide variety of sources will likewise be provided to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to boost the security of AI with, among other things, companies in the sector needed to share information of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is stated to want the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a number of suits against AI companies, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their consent, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of elements which can constitute fair use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training data and whether it ought to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being the a lot of downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its technology for a portion of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It has plenty of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to check out in parts since it's so verbose.

But provided how rapidly the tech is progressing, bbarlock.com I'm unsure the length of time I can remain positive that my considerably slower human writing and modifying abilities, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in global innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Register here.